Note to George W, Bush –

Amitabh Bacchan, the father rapist of Bollywood, the Harvey Weinstein of Bollywood, has brought forth another abomination into the world of Indian cinema, a film by the name of ‘Syeraa’. If Harvey Weinstein is condemned by the people of the United States of America, then why is Amitabh Bacchan not condemned by the people of India? Why have the women of Bollywood not protested against him, stopped him dead in his tracks, put and end to him? The news is flooded with #MeToo stories from Indian journalists. Why is Bollywood silent in the case of its own Harvey Weinstein? Amitabh Bacchan is known and famed for his countless acts of sexual predation on film sets. His legacy in the public eye bears this stamp. Why is it that in the midst of the #MeToo campaign, no sign of stopping the release of Amitabh Bacchan’s films has been raised by Indian film boards, the censorship board, or women who work in Bollywood? Amitabh Bacchan is the Harvey Weinstein of Bollwood, of India. Why have the concerned boards and bodies not stopped the release of his forth-coming films, ‘Syeraa’ and ‘Thugs of Hindostan’? We have so many claims on the part of Deepika Padukone that she is a feminist, an advocate for women’s rights. Then, why has she not spoken up against Amitabh Bacchan? Why has she signed film contracts with him despite his legacy as a molestor/rapist/pedophile that spans decades? Why is she hands-in-glove with molestors/rapists/pedophiles? Why is she their female accomplice in her battle to subjugate other women? Why has she chosen a battle that will subjugate other women? Her recent OPPO phone and L’Oreal, Paris advertisements are marked evidence that she is a woman who is a predator, a woman who collaborates with men to violate women, a woman who champions men who prey upon women. Her boyfriend, Ranveer Singh, is guilty of the same behaviour. His Kotak banking advertisements are the immediate evidence at hand. Why has no one spoken about Deepika Padukone’s role in the championing of sexual predators? She plays a cheap sex-doll role as a side-kick to a pedophile Amitabh Bacchan in ‘Piku’. As one can see clearly, she herself is a victim of Amitabh Bacchan’s sexual predation. She is an accomplice and victim at the same time. And how can one forget her pseudo-incestuous relationship with her real-life father, Prakash Padukone? Why have journalists not written about this? Why have journalists not written about the plagiarism of Godard, Karina and Johnny Depp? The facts are out in the open for everyone to see. It is the job of a journalist to write about such matters,  to have stories on the daily news about things that people know. When such facts are known to the public, it must be reported by journalists. That is their calling. Plagiarism and sexual predation in Bollywood are very widely known facts. Why are the facts that people know not being exposed by papers, media houses, and news channels? If everyone knows the facts, it is about time that media houses started doing their work.

If Amitabh Bacchan is the Harvey Weinstein of Bollywood, shouldn’t the releases of ‘Syeraa’ and ‘Thugs of Hindostan’ be stopped?

The answer lies with you, respected Mr. President.